Search Results

You searched for:
Label: Dumville 1994

Results: 1-1 of 1

Show all data

  • Metadata

    Dumville 1994. Dumville, D. N., 'English Square Minuscule Script: the Mid-Century Phases', Anglo-Saxon England 23 (1994), 133–64. 48 charters cited.

    • S 399. Comments, pp. 158-9
    • S 400. Comments, on background, pp. 158-9
    • S 447. Comments, on script, p. 159
    • S 449. Comments, on script, p. 159
    • S 464. Comments, on script, pp. 144-51, 159
    • S 470. Comments, on script, pp. 144-51, 159
    • S 497. Comments, on script, pp. 144-51
    • S 510. Comments, on script, pp. 144-51
    • S 512. Comments, on script, pp. 144-51
    • S 528. Comments, on script, pp. 144-51
    • S 535. Comments, on script, pp. 144-51
    • S 540. Comments, script of MS 1 is imitative, p. 146 n. 71
    • S 546. Comments, agrees with Lapidge, p. 146 n. 71
    • S 550. Comments, p. 162
    • S 552. Comments, on script, pp. 144-51
    • S 563. Comments, on script, pp. 144-51
    • S 602. Comments, MS 1 written in imitative script, p. 146 n. 71
    • S 618. Comments, script of MS 1 not s. x med., perhaps s. x2, p. 146 n. 71
    • S 623. Comments, MS 1 written in imitative script, p. 146 n. 71
    • S 624. Comments, on script, pp. 144-51
    • S 636. Comments, on script, pp. 144-51
    • S 649. Comments, on script, pp. 144-51, 160
    • S 669. Comments, imitative script, p. 146 n. 51
    • S 670. Comments, non-contemporary Square Minuscule, not s. x med, p. 146 n. 71
    • S 671. Comments, script of MS 1 is non-contemporary Square Minuscule, p. 146 n. 71
    • S 677. Comments, on script, pp. 144-51, 156 n. 123, 160
    • S 684. Comments, late style of Square Minuscule, p. 155 n. 117
    • S 687. Comments, on script of MS 1, pp. 151-6, 160
    • S 690. Comments, on script, esp. pp. 152-3; scribe of dating clause and witness-list may have been Oswald, pp. 151-6, 162
    • S 697. Comments, late style of Square minuscule, p. 115
    • S 703. Comments, on script, pp. 151-6
    • S 704. Comments, physical form anomalous, some problems in script, p. 154
    • S 706. Comments, on script, pp. 151-6
    • S 717. Comments, on script, pp. 151-6
    • S 736. Comments, on script, p. 155 nn. 117 & 122
    • S 745. Comments, cited, p. 162
    • S 801. Comments, MS 1 could be contemporary, p. 160 n. 146
    • S 830. Comments, note on script, p. 161
    • S 864. Comments, on script, pp. 156 n. 125, 161
    • S 892. Comments, script is old-fashioned, cf. also S 898, p. 161 n. 151
    • S 898. Comments, slightly old-fashioned script, cf. also S 892, p. 161 n. 151
    • S 1211. Comments, on script, pp. 146-7, 155 n. 122
    • S 1215. Comments, on script, p. 156 n. 123
    • S 1326. Comments, cited, p. 154 n. 123
    • S 1450. Comments, on script of MSS 1, 2, pp. 156 n. 125, 161
    • S 1497. Comments, cited, p. 146 n. 75
    • S 1506. Comments, on script, dates it 941 x 958, pp. 146-7
    • S 1539. Comments, script not mid 10th-century, suggested date c. 950 is speculative and too early, p. 146 n. 75